From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

APPLICATION OF FUN COUNTRY DEVELOP. AUTHORITY

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Jul 12, 1977
1977 OK 138 (Okla. 1977)

Opinion

No. 50942.

July 12, 1977.

Original proceedings on Application to Assume Jurisdiction.

Jurisdiction Assumed; Relief Denied.

Floyd, Brandenburg Rogers, Norman, for petitioner.


This case is submitted on an original and uncontested application by petitioner. Fun Country Development Authority, asks this court to assume jurisdiction and determine the validity of promissory revenue notes or bonds issued to finance the construction, development and expansion of certain television properties. The application further seeks determination of whether the development and expansion of television capabilities as herein contemplated are the proper subjects for a public trust under 60 O.S. 1971 § 176[ 60-176] et seq, as amended.

There can be no doubt that this court has in the past assumed jurisdiction and granted relief under exact or similar circumstances; see Application of Southern Oklahoma Development Trust, 470 P.2d 572 (Okla. 1970) and In Re: Application of Board of Education of Western Heights Independent School District No. 41, Oklahoma County, Oklahoma, 565 P.2d 677 (Okla. 1977).

Today we decline to follow these precedents on the grounds that we will issue no further advisory opinions. This is not to say, however, that this court lacks such jurisdiction. The last cited case is but the most recent of a series that should end, and our holding shall not be interpreted as a challenge to such previous opinions or orders of this court.

We are not unmindful of Shotts v. Hugh, 551 P.2d 252 (Okla. 1976) and Morrison v. Ardmore Industrial Development Corporation, 444 P.2d 816 (Okla. 1968); but point out that in these cases a justiciable controversy existed and that fact together with the public importance of the matter dictated assumption of jurisdiction and granting of relief.

No controversy is here presented, no contest or challenge as to procedure is made.

We decline to issue an advisory opinion.

JURISDICTION ASSUMED; RELIEF DENIED.

HODGES, C.J., and WILLIAMS, BERRY and BARNES, JJ., concur.

LAVENDER, V.C.J., and SIMMS, J., concur in result.


Summaries of

APPLICATION OF FUN COUNTRY DEVELOP. AUTHORITY

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Jul 12, 1977
1977 OK 138 (Okla. 1977)
Case details for

APPLICATION OF FUN COUNTRY DEVELOP. AUTHORITY

Case Details

Full title:APPLICATION OF FUN COUNTRY DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY FOR APPROVAL OF PROPOSED…

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Jul 12, 1977

Citations

1977 OK 138 (Okla. 1977)
1977 OK 138

Citing Cases

Tulsa Industrial Authority v. City of Tulsa

See, e.g., In re Application of Oklahoma Department of Transportation, 2003 OK 105, n. 21, 82 P.3d 1000, 1007…

Tulsa Indus. Auth. v. City of Tulsa

See, e.g., In re Application of Oklahoma Department of Transportation, 2003 OK 105, n. 21, 82 P.3d 1000, 1007…