From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Aphena Pharma Solutions-Md., LLC v. Biozone Labs., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Mar 4, 2013
Case No.: 3:12-cv-06292 SC (N.D. Cal. Mar. 4, 2013)

Opinion

Case No.: 3:12-cv-06292 SC

03-04-2013

APHENA PHARMA SOLUTIONS - MARYLAND, LLC, Plaintiff, v. BIOZONE LABORATORIES, INC., et al., Defendants.

ADRIENE PLESCIA LYNCH (State Bar No. 259100) ALSTON & BIRD LLP ANDREW BENJAMIN KAY (DC Bar No. 463912) (admitted pro hac vice ) KELLEY CONNOLLY BARNABY (DC Bar No. 998757) (admitted pro hac vice ) ALSTON & BIRD LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff APHENA PHARMA SOLUTIONS - MARYLAND, LLC


ADRIENE PLESCIA LYNCH (State Bar No. 259100)
ALSTON & BIRD LLP
ANDREW BENJAMIN KAY (DC Bar No. 463912) (admitted pro hac vice)
KELLEY CONNOLLY BARNABY (DC Bar No. 998757) (admitted pro hac vice)
ALSTON & BIRD LLP
Attorneys for Plaintiff
APHENA PHARMA SOLUTIONS - MARYLAND, LLC

Honorable Samuel Conti


STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER SELECTING ADR

PROCESS PURSUANT TO CIVIL

L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5

TO THE HONORABLE SAMUEL CONTI:

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:

The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:

Court Processes:
_____ Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
_____ Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
_____ Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)

(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR, must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5.)

Private Process:

__X__ Private ADR (please identify process and provider) The parties have agreed in principle to appear before a private mediator, but have not yet agreed on a particular mediator. The parties are continuing to work together to finalize their agreement and to identify a mediator with availability and the requisite experience.

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:

_____X_____ the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.)

_____ other requested deadline of _____, 2013.

Respectfully submitted,

ANDREW BENJAMIN KAY

KELLEY CONNOLLY BARNABY

ADRIENE PLESCIA LYNCH

ALSTON & BIRD LLP

____________________

Adriene Plescia Lynch

Attorney for Plaintiff

Aphena Pharma Solutions-Maryland, LLC

RICHARD WILLIAMS

GRAY DUFFY, LLP

____________________

Richard Williams

Attorney for Defendant Daniel Fisher

ROBERT WALLACE

WILSON ELSER MOSKOWITZ EDELMAN & DICKER LLP

____________________

Robert Wallace

Attorney for Defendants BioZone Laboratories, Inc.

and BioZone Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

X The parties' stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED. _____ The parties' stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________________

HONORABLE SAMUEL CONTI


Summaries of

Aphena Pharma Solutions-Md., LLC v. Biozone Labs., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Mar 4, 2013
Case No.: 3:12-cv-06292 SC (N.D. Cal. Mar. 4, 2013)
Case details for

Aphena Pharma Solutions-Md., LLC v. Biozone Labs., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:APHENA PHARMA SOLUTIONS - MARYLAND, LLC, Plaintiff, v. BIOZONE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Date published: Mar 4, 2013

Citations

Case No.: 3:12-cv-06292 SC (N.D. Cal. Mar. 4, 2013)