Summary
allowing depositions of Government officials due to allegations of favoritism
Summary of this case from Orion International Technologies v. U.S.Opinion
No. 00-5052.
December 14, 2000.
Appeal from CVA, 46 Fed.Cl. 145.
Affirmed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Ant. Support Assoc. v. U.S. Raytheon Tech
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Dec 14, 2000
251 F.3d 171 (Fed. Cir. 2000)
Summaries of
Ant. Support Assoc. v. U.S. Raytheon Tech
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Dec 14, 2000
251 F.3d 171 (Fed. Cir. 2000)
allowing depositions of Government officials due to allegations of favoritism
Summary of this case from Orion International Technologies v. U.S.allowing plaintiffs to take four depositions of Government officials involved in the procurement where plaintiffs had alleged that the contracting officers arbitrarily made the award due to favoritism
Summary of this case from International Resource Recovery, Inc. v. U.S.noting that challengers “must do more than point out mere ‘mistakes' or ‘missteps;’ they must ‘show that the claimed misstep was so excessive as to fall outside the decision-maker's ambit of discretion.’ ”
Summary of this case from Rochester City Lines, Co. v. City of RochesterCase details for
Ant. Support Assoc. v. U.S. Raytheon Tech
Case Details
Full title:ANTARCTIC SUPPORT ASSOCIATES v. U.S. RAYTHEON TECHNICAL SERVICES CO
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Date published: Dec 14, 2000
Citations
251 F.3d 171 (Fed. Cir. 2000)
Citing Cases
SAI Industries Corp. v. United States
Thus, we shall not disturb the government agency's determinations if SAI "point[s] out mere `mistakes' or…
Rochester City Lines, Co. v. City of RochesterIn re Excess Surplus Status of Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Minn., 624 N.W.2d 264, 277 (Minn.2001) (quoting…