From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ansonia Assoc. v. Quick Park Ansonia G. C

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 11, 1999
259 A.D.2d 308 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

March 11, 1999

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Ramos, J.).


Plaintiff is seeking to pierce the corporate veil to hold corporate defendants Quick Park Columbia Garage Corporation and Evan Garage Corporation and individual defendant Jacob Sopher liable for a $367,000 judgment obtained by plaintiff against the aforementioned corporate defendants' wholly owned and now insolvent subsidiary, defendant Quick Park Ansonia Garage Corporation. While the record contains strong indicia of domination and control by the former corporate entities over the judgment debtor ( see, Passalacqua Bldrs. v. Resnick Developers S., 933 F.2d 131, 138; Anderson St. Realty Corp. v. RHMB New Rochelle Leasing Corp., 243 A.D.2d 595), plaintiff has failed, despite substantial discovery in the judgment debtor's bankruptcy proceeding, to make the showing requisite to disregard of the corporate form that such domination and control as there was over the now insolvent corporation was used for fraudulent ends and, indeed, that it was the cause of the debtor's insolvency and, more specifically, of its inability to pay: plaintiff rent In the absence of evidence sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether the corporate form was abused so as to cause plaintiff's injury, the action against the non-judgment debtor corporate defendants was properly dismissed ( see, TNS Holdings v. MKI Sec. Corp., 92 N.Y.2d 335; Anderson St. Realty corp. v. RHMB New Rochelle Leasing Corp., supra). Plaintiff's action insofar as it was asserted against, individual defendant Sopher was also properly dismissed since there is no evidence to support plaintiff's claim that Sopher used the debtor corporation for "purely personal rather than corporate ends" ( Walkovszky v. Carlton, 18 N.Y.2d 414, 418; accord, Port Chester Elec. Constr. Corp. v. Atlas, 40 N.Y.2d 652, 656-657).

Concur — Ellerin, P. J., Nardelli, Williams and Andrias, JJ.


Summaries of

Ansonia Assoc. v. Quick Park Ansonia G. C

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 11, 1999
259 A.D.2d 308 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Ansonia Assoc. v. Quick Park Ansonia G. C

Case Details

Full title:ANSONIA ASSOCIATES LIMITED, Appellant, v. QUICK PARK ANSONIA GARAGE CORP.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 11, 1999

Citations

259 A.D.2d 308 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
686 N.Y.S.2d 418

Citing Cases

In re Adelphia Communications Corp.

The critical question is whether the corporation is a shell being used by the individual shareowners to…

Brito v. DILP Corp.

The IAS court should have granted summary judgment to defendant Dillenberger. An owner and shareholder of a…