Anova Applied Elecs. v. Inkbird Tech. C. L.

Full title: Anova Applied Electronics, Inc. Plaintiff, v. Inkbird Tech. C.L., a…

Court: United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: Jul 22, 2024

2:23-cv-00845-JLR (W.D. Wash. Jul. 22, 2024)

Opinion

2:23-cv-00845-JLR

07-22-2024

Anova Applied Electronics, Inc. Plaintiff, v. Inkbird Tech. C.L., a Chinese company; Shenzhen Jingtaitengda Technology Co., Ltd. d/b/a "Dreamytenda;" and Shenzhenshi Yingbozhikong Keji Youxian Gongsi d/b/a "Mixtea360" Defendants.

TBILLICK LAW PLLC By: Tim J. Billick, WSBA No. 46690 600 Attorney for Plaintiff GLACIER LAW LLP By: Dandan Pan (Pro Hac Vic) Tao liu (Pro Hac Vic) Wei Wang (Pro Hac Vic), LAW OFFICE OF CARL J. MARQUARDT PLLC Carl J. Marquardt (WSBA No. 23257) Attorneys for Defendants

JAMES L. ROBART, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Noting Dated: July 19, 2024

TBILLICK LAW PLLC By: Tim J. Billick, WSBA No. 46690 600 Attorney for Plaintiff

GLACIER LAW LLP By: Dandan Pan (Pro Hac Vic) Tao liu (Pro Hac Vic) Wei Wang (Pro Hac Vic), LAW OFFICE OF CARL J. MARQUARDT PLLC Carl J. Marquardt (WSBA No. 23257) Attorneys for Defendants

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT COUNTERCLAIMS

JAMES L. ROBART, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This matter came before the Court on the parties' Stipulated Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint Counterclaims. The Court having reviewed the pleadings and considered the files and records herein.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Stipulated Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint Counterclaims is GRANTED. Plaintiffs deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint Counterclaims is extended to July 24, 2024.