From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Anonymous v. Anonymous

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 4, 2003
302 A.D.2d 378 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2001-09375

Submitted April 22, 2002.

February 4, 2003.

In a paternity proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 5, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County (Koenig, J.), dated October 4, 2001, which, in effect, denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Jeffrey S. Schecter, Garden City, N.Y. (Bryce R. Levine of counsel), for appellant.

Eric Dubinsky, Carle Place, N.Y., for respondent.

Before: FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P., SONDRA MILLER, GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The petitioner seeks an order of filiation against, and support from, the respondent to whom she was engaged when they allegedly agreed to attempt to have children by means of artificial insemination. The parties never married and their relationship terminated shortly before the petitioner gave birth to twin girls who were conceived by use of donated sperm.

Under these circumstances, the Family Court properly concluded that it did not possess subject matter jurisdiction over this proceeding (see Matter of Allison D. v. Virginia M., 77 N.Y.2d 651). Furthermore, Domestic Relations Law § 73 is inapplicable since its provisions are limited to married couples.

SANTUCCI, J.P., S. MILLER, KRAUSMAN and GOLDSTEIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Anonymous v. Anonymous

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 4, 2003
302 A.D.2d 378 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Anonymous v. Anonymous

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF ANONYMOUS, appellant, v. ANONYMOUS, respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 4, 2003

Citations

302 A.D.2d 378 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
754 N.Y.S.2d 559

Citing Cases

MATTER OF CM v. CH

The ruling in Jean Maby H. (supra) is completely contrary to, and in this court's opinion irreconcilable…

In the Matter of C.M. v. C.H

Jean Maby H., however, stands alone while Janis C. reflects other, more recent, Second Department appellate…