From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ankerman v. Mancuso

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Nov 4, 2003
835 A.2d 471 (Conn. 2003)

Opinion

Decided November 4, 2003


The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 79 Conn. App. 480 (AC 23369), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court improperly refused to enforce a secondary mortgage loan transaction made by an attorney with a client despite its finding that the transaction violated the public policy underlying rule 1.8(j) of the Rules of Professional Conduct?"

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17086.

James Colin Mulholland, in support of the petition.

William L. Ankerman, pro se, in opposition.


Summaries of

Ankerman v. Mancuso

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Nov 4, 2003
835 A.2d 471 (Conn. 2003)
Case details for

Ankerman v. Mancuso

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM L. ANKERMAN v. JACK C. MANCUSO

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: Nov 4, 2003

Citations

835 A.2d 471 (Conn. 2003)
835 A.2d 471

Citing Cases

Ankerman v. Mancuso

We thereafter granted the defendant's petition for certification to appeal limited to the following issue:…