Opinion
2:22-cv-2325
10-19-2022
Achak Ben Aniyunwiya, Plaintiff, v. Matthew Lutz, et al., Defendants.
OPINION AND ORDER
MICHAEL H. WATSON, JUDGE
Magistrate Judge Silvain, Jr. performed an initial screen of this pro se, prisoner civil rights case, brought in forma pauperis, under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a) and 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), and on September 28, 2022, he issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) recommending the Court dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint and certify that any appeal would not be in good faith. R&R 12, ECF No. 12. The R&R notified Plaintiff of his right to object to the recommendations therein and that failure to timely object would amount to a forfeiture of both the right to de novo review by the Undersigned as well as a right to appeal the Court's adoption of the R&R. Id. at 13.
The deadline for filing such objections has passed, and no objections were filed. Having received no objections, the R&R is ADOPTED. The claims against Sheriff Lutz, Sheriff Deputy Swiney, Nurse Shelly, Judge Fleegle, Captain LeCocq, Captain Suciu, Prosecutor Little, Prosecutor Welch, and Attorney Edwards are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
Further, the Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith.
The Clerk is DIRECTED to close the case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.