Opinion
Case No. 1:11-cv-03011-CL.
June 14, 2011
ORDER
Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Report and Recommendation, and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). Although no objections have been filed, this court reviews legal principles de novo. See Lorin Corp. v Goto Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1983).
I agree with Magistrate Judge Clarke that the complaint is deficient and must be dismissed. I also agree that plaintiffs, who are representing themselves, should be allowed to file an amended complaint. Accordingly, I ADOPT the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Clarke.
CONCLUSION
Magistrate Judge Clarke's Report and Recommendation (#10) is adopted. Defendants' request for judicial notice (#5) is granted in part and denied in part. Defendants' motion to dismiss (#3) is granted. Plaintiffs' request for leave to file an amended complaint is granted, subject to the limits set by the Report and Recommendation.
IT IS SO ORDERED.