From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Anfield v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Mar 19, 1993
615 So. 2d 853 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

Opinion

No. 92-04594.

March 19, 1993.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Hillsborough County, Diana M. Allen, J.


Anfield appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct sentence. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.

Anfield claims the four consecutive three-year minimum mandatory sentences imposed pursuant to section 775.087(2), Florida Statutes (1989), constitute an illegal sentence because he did not carry a firearm during the commission of the offenses. If Anfield's claim is true, the sentence is illegal. See Bell v. State, 589 So.2d 1374 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991).

In summarily denying Anfield's motion, the trial court attached a copy of the plea colloquy. The colloquy reflects that Anfield's counsel stipulated to a factual basis for the offenses. However, that transcript is not sufficient to establish conclusively that there was factual information to support the imposition of the minimum mandatory sentences. Cf. Koenig v. State, 597 So.2d 256 (Fla. 1992).

Accordingly, we reverse and remand for further proceedings. On remand, the trial court may again deny the relief requested and attach to its order of denial that portion of the record refuting Anfield's claim or conduct an evidentiary hearing.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL and BLUE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Anfield v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Mar 19, 1993
615 So. 2d 853 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)
Case details for

Anfield v. State

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY ANFIELD, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Mar 19, 1993

Citations

615 So. 2d 853 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

Citing Cases

Stacey v. State

Stacey seeks to have the firearm minimum mandatory stricken by us or, at least, to have the matter remanded…

Mancino v. State

Ironically, the genesis for our precedent in this area of the law stems from a First District case. See…