From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Andrews v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Nov 6, 1980
390 So. 2d 61 (Fla. 1980)

Opinion

No. 57496.

November 6, 1980.

Certiorari to the District Court of Appeal, Third District-Case No. 77-796.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Elliot H. Scherker, Asst. Public Defender, Miami, for petitioner.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Steven R. Jacob, Asst. Atty. Gen., Miami, for respondent.


The petition for writ of certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. After hearing argument and upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the Court is without jurisdiction. Therefore, the writ of certiorari must be and is hereby discharged.

No motion for rehearing will be entertained by this Court. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.330(d).

It is so ordered.

Opinion Below: 372 So.2d 143.

SUNDBERG, C.J., and ADKINS, BOYD, OVERTON, ALDERMAN and McDONALD, JJ., concur.

ENGLAND, J., dissents.


Summaries of

Andrews v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Nov 6, 1980
390 So. 2d 61 (Fla. 1980)
Case details for

Andrews v. State

Case Details

Full title:PATRICIA ANDREWS, PETITIONER, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Nov 6, 1980

Citations

390 So. 2d 61 (Fla. 1980)

Citing Cases

Sampson v. State

See, Jefferson v. State, 298 So.2d 465 (Fla.3d DCA 1974); Mallory v. State, 211 So.2d 69 (Fla.3d DCA 1968);…

Damon v. State

It is now well-settled that when, as in this case, there are so-called "interlocking confessions" — that is,…