From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Anderson v. Ricks

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 19, 2003
306 A.D.2d 715 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

92682

Decided and Entered: June 19, 2003.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Franklin County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Joseph Anderson, Malone, petitioner pro se.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, Albany (Wayne Benjamin of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Spain, Mugglin and Kane, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

Following a tier II disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules prohibiting inmates from creating a disturbance, interfering with a facility employee and harassment. As related in the misbehavior report, the reporting correction officer was attempting to comply with petitioner's request to locate legal materials that, according to petitioner, could be found in his personal property bags. The officer was unable to find any legal materials and refused petitioner's request to give him other items from the bags that did not constitute legal materials. Petitioner became agitated and subjected the officer to a lengthy barrage of profane insults that was readily audible to inmates in the neighboring cells.

Substantial evidence of petitioner's guilt of the charged misconduct was presented in the form of the misbehavior report and the testimony given by the reporting officer and a second officer who witnessed the incident in question (see Matter of Law v. Goord, 301 A.D.2d 703, 704; Matter of Duran v. Senkowski, 289 A.D.2d 906, 907). The remaining issues raised by petitioner, including his assertion of hearing officer bias, are either meritless or unpreserved for our review.

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Spain, Mugglin and Kane, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Anderson v. Ricks

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 19, 2003
306 A.D.2d 715 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Anderson v. Ricks

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF JOSEPH ANDERSON, Petitioner, v. THOMAS L. RICKS, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jun 19, 2003

Citations

306 A.D.2d 715 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
760 N.Y.S.2d 699

Citing Cases

In the Matter of Ramirez v. Schultz

In addition, the respondent's contention that the petitioner interfered with a prison employee is not…