From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Anderson v. Recorder's Court

Court of Appeal of California, Second District
Feb 4, 1918
36 Cal.App. 123 (Cal. Ct. App. 1918)

Opinion

Civ. No. 2421.

February 4, 1918.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Imperial County. Franklin J. Cole, Judge.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

William Sea, Jr., for Appellant.

D. L. Ault, for Respondents.


This is an appeal from a judgment rendered on writ of certiorari. The only record on file is in the form of a typewritten transcript. Appellant has not complied with section 953c of the Code of Civil Procedure, which provides that upon such a record the parties must "print in their briefs, or in a supplement appended thereto, such portions of the record as they desire to call to the attention of the court." The brief for appellant is absolutely deficient, in that no part of the record has been printed therein.

On the authority of Stewart v. Andrews, 35 Cal.App. 230, [ 169 P. 397]; Jones v. American Potash Co., 35 Cal.App. 128, [ 169 P. 397]; Hepler v. Wright, 35 Cal.App. 567, [ 170 P. 667], and other cases cited in those decisions, the judgment is affirmed.

A petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on April 4, 1918.


Summaries of

Anderson v. Recorder's Court

Court of Appeal of California, Second District
Feb 4, 1918
36 Cal.App. 123 (Cal. Ct. App. 1918)
Case details for

Anderson v. Recorder's Court

Case Details

Full title:FRED N. ANDERSON, Appellant, v. THE RECORDER'S COURT, etc., et al.…

Court:Court of Appeal of California, Second District

Date published: Feb 4, 1918

Citations

36 Cal.App. 123 (Cal. Ct. App. 1918)
171 P. 812

Citing Cases

Patten Davies Lumber Co. v. Inman

[1] The record is presented in accordance with the method provided in section 953a of the Code of Civil…