From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Anderson v. Evans

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Apr 17, 2006
No. CIV-05-1145-L (W.D. Okla. Apr. 17, 2006)

Opinion

No. CIV-05-1145-L.

April 17, 2006


ORDER


This matter is before the court for review of the Report and Recommendation entered by the Honorable Robert E. Bacharach on March 13, 2006, in which he recommended denying the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. The court file reflects that no party has objected to the Report and Recommendation within the time limits prescribed and to date petitioner has failed to object to the Report and Recommendation. Having conducted a de novo review of this matter, the court finds that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted in its entirety. Respondent's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 14) and the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 by a Person in State Custody (Doc. No. 1) are DENIED. In light of this ruling, the court DENIES Petitioner's Emergency Application for a Temporary Restraining Order and/or a Preliminary Injunction Against the Respondents (Doc. No. 12). Judgment will issue accordingly.

It is so ordered.


Summaries of

Anderson v. Evans

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Apr 17, 2006
No. CIV-05-1145-L (W.D. Okla. Apr. 17, 2006)
Case details for

Anderson v. Evans

Case Details

Full title:RYAN ANDERSON, Petitioner, v. EDWARD EVANS, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Date published: Apr 17, 2006

Citations

No. CIV-05-1145-L (W.D. Okla. Apr. 17, 2006)

Citing Cases

Smallwood v. Scibana

His complaints about the initial hearing were thereby rendered moot. See Hayes v. Evans, 70 F.3d 85, 86 (10th…

Daniels v. Swarthout

linary conviction were rendered moot); Craft v. Jones, No. CIV-11-728-HE, 2011 WL 5509876, at *1 (W.D. Okla.…