From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Anderson v. English

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
Jun 17, 2019
CASE NO. 19-3072-JWL (D. Kan. Jun. 17, 2019)

Opinion

CASE NO. 19-3072-JWL

06-17-2019

CARLON ANDERSON, Petitioner, v. N. ENGLISH, Warden, USP-Leavenworth, Respondent.


ORDER

This matter is a petition for habeas corpus filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. On May 7, 2019, the Court entered an Order (Doc. 4) denying Petitioner's Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and ordering Petitioner to submit the $5.00 filing fee by May 24, 2019. Petitioner failed to submit the filing fee by the deadline. On May 29, 2019, the Court entered an Order to Show Cause (Doc. 5) granting Petitioner until June 14, 2019, in which to show cause why this action should not be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b) for failure to comply with court orders. Petitioner has failed to respond to the Order to Show Cause and the deadline for responding has passed.

Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure "authorizes a district court, upon a defendant's motion, to order the dismissal of an action for failure to prosecute or for failure to comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or 'a court order.'" Young v. U.S., 316 F. App'x 764, 771 (10th Cir. 2009) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b)). "This rule has been interpreted as permitting district courts to dismiss actions sua sponte when one of these conditions is met." Id. (citing Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 630-31 (1962); Olsen v. Mapes, 333 F.3d 1199, 1204 n.3 (10th Cir. 2003)). "In addition, it is well established in this circuit that a district court is not obligated to follow any particular procedures when dismissing an action without prejudice under Rule 41(b)." Young, 316 F. App'x at 771-72 (citations omitted).

Plaintiff has failed to comply with the Court's Orders within the allowed time. Therefore, this case is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b).

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT this case is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b) for failure to comply with court orders.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated in Kansas City, Kansas, on this 17th day of June, 2019.

S/ John W. Lungstrum

JOHN W. LUNGSTRUM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Anderson v. English

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
Jun 17, 2019
CASE NO. 19-3072-JWL (D. Kan. Jun. 17, 2019)
Case details for

Anderson v. English

Case Details

Full title:CARLON ANDERSON, Petitioner, v. N. ENGLISH, Warden, USP-Leavenworth…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

Date published: Jun 17, 2019

Citations

CASE NO. 19-3072-JWL (D. Kan. Jun. 17, 2019)