From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Anderson v. Duke

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Jan 28, 2008
9:04-CV-0030 (NAM/DEP) (N.D.N.Y. Jan. 28, 2008)

Opinion

9:04-CV-0030 (NAM/DEP).

January 28, 2008

FOR THE PLAINTIFF: LESSIE ANDERSON, pro se.

FOR THE DEFENDANT: HON. ANDREW M. CUOMO, Office of the Attorney General, ADRIENNE J. KERWIN, ESQ., Assistant Attorney General, State of New York, Albany, NY.


ORDER


The above matter comes to me following a Report-Recommendation by Magistrate Judge David E. Peebles, duly filed on the 4th day of January, 2008. Following ten days from the service thereof, the Clerk has sent me the file, including any and all objections filed by the parties herein.

After careful review of all of the papers herein, including the Magistrate Judge's Report-Recommendation, and no objections submitted thereto, it is

ORDERED, that:

1. The Report-Recommendation is hereby approved.

2. The defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing plaintiff's complaint in its entirety (Dkt. No. 50) is granted in all respects, with prejudice as against defendants Duke, McLaughlin and Testo but without prejudice as against the defendant identified only as "Watch Commander.".

3. The Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Order upon all parties and the Magistrate Judge assigned to this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Anderson v. Duke

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Jan 28, 2008
9:04-CV-0030 (NAM/DEP) (N.D.N.Y. Jan. 28, 2008)
Case details for

Anderson v. Duke

Case Details

Full title:LESSIE ANDERSON, Plaintiff, v. LOYCE DUKE, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, N.D. New York

Date published: Jan 28, 2008

Citations

9:04-CV-0030 (NAM/DEP) (N.D.N.Y. Jan. 28, 2008)

Citing Cases

Vigliotti v. Daly

See Complaint (Dkt. No. 1) ¶ 15. It is well established, however, that violations of such regulations are not…

Vargas v. Renzi

These claims are dismissed with prejudice. "[I]nmate grievance programs created by state [or local] law are…