From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Anderson v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Mar 24, 1980
614 F.2d 535 (5th Cir. 1980)

Opinion

Nos. 77-2048, 77-2049.

March 24, 1980.

Gregory A. Pletsch, David Irvin Couvillion, Theodore L. Jones, Baton Rouge, La., for petitioners-appellants.

M. Carr Ferguson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Gilbert E. Andrews, Act. Chief, App. Sect., William Estabrook, Atty., U.S. Dept. of Justice, Internal Rev. Service, Leon G. Wigrizer, Acting Chief Counsel, Stanley S. Shaw, Jr., Atty., Tax Div., Dept. of Just., Washington, D.C., for C. I. R. in both cases.

Lester Stein, Acting Chief Counsel, IRS, Washington, D.C., for C. I. R. in 77-2048.

Stuart E. Seigel, Internal Rev. Service, Washington, D.C., for C. I. R. in 77-2049.

Appeals from the Decisions of the United States Tax Court.

Before SIMPSON, TJOFLAT, and HILL, Circuit Judges.


Taxpayers appeal from a Tax Court ruling that they did not qualify under I.R.C. § 1201 for a twenty-five percent capital gains tax rate on their sale of stock. 1976 T.C.M. ¶ 76,362 (P-H). The narrow issue before us is whether the Tax Court erred in concluding that the taxpayers had not sold their stock pursuant to a binding contract in effect on November 9, 1969. We cannot say that the Tax Court's finding of fact on this issue is clearly erroneous or that it erred in holding that the alleged agreement was unenforceable. The Tax Court therefore is

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Anderson v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Mar 24, 1980
614 F.2d 535 (5th Cir. 1980)
Case details for

Anderson v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:PAUL H. ANDERSON AND FRANCES M. ANDERSON, PETITIONERS-APPELLANTS, v…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Mar 24, 1980

Citations

614 F.2d 535 (5th Cir. 1980)

Citing Cases

Hans S. Mannheimer Charitable Trust v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

The point is that it chose to legislative (sic) in terms of a hard and fast rule.‘ Wiese v. Commissioner,…