From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Anderson v. Baker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 23, 1998
248 A.D.2d 572 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

March 23, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCaffrey, J.).


Ordered that the appeal from the order is dismissed, as that order was superseded by the interlocutory judgment; and it is further,

Ordered that the interlocutory judgment is reversed, on the law, the motion to set aside the verdict on the ground that it is not supported by sufficient evidence as a matter of law is granted, the order dated May 28, 1997, is vacated, and the complaint is dismissed; and it is further,

Ordered that the defendants are awarded one bill of costs.

The trial court erred in denying the defendants' motion to set aside the verdict on the ground that it is not supported by sufficient evidence as a matter of law since there was "no valid line of reasoning and permissible inferences which could possibly lead rational men to the conclusion reached by the jury on the basis of the evidence presented at trial" ( Cohen v. Hallmark Cards, 45 N.Y.2d 493, 499; Nicastro v. Park, 113 A.D.2d 129, 132).

Rosenblatt, J. P., Sullivan, Santucci and Goldstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Anderson v. Baker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 23, 1998
248 A.D.2d 572 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Anderson v. Baker

Case Details

Full title:ELAINE ANDERSON, Respondent, v. CLIFFORD J. BAKER et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 23, 1998

Citations

248 A.D.2d 572 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
669 N.Y.S.2d 915

Citing Cases

Brown v. State

Moreover, the exception contained in the former CPLR 1602(4) is not applicable since it refers only to…