From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Amsterdam Urban Renewal Agency v. McGrattan

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 26, 1983
449 N.E.2d 1273 (N.Y. 1983)

Opinion

Decided April 26, 1983

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, GUY A. GRAVES, J.

Richard A. Insogna for appellants.

Vincent E. Vicinanzo for respondent.


On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division ( 91 A.D.2d 792).

Concur: Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG, MEYER and SIMONS.


Summaries of

Amsterdam Urban Renewal Agency v. McGrattan

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 26, 1983
449 N.E.2d 1273 (N.Y. 1983)
Case details for

Amsterdam Urban Renewal Agency v. McGrattan

Case Details

Full title:AMSTERDAM URBAN RENEWAL AGENCY, Respondent, v. FRANCIS L. McGRATTAN et…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 26, 1983

Citations

449 N.E.2d 1273 (N.Y. 1983)
449 N.E.2d 1273
463 N.Y.S.2d 195

Citing Cases

Davis Auction House v. Ontario National Bank

Because the bank acted within its statutory authority in paying the item in accordance with its original…