Summary
summarizing the consensus among precedent that when the allegation of unjust enrichment is against a third party that indirectly benefitted from a contract between two other parties, "the law requires that the third party have specifically requested the benefit or misled the plaintiff."
Summary of this case from EMC Outdoor, LLC v. StuartOpinion
NO. 154 EDA 2013
2013-10-04
Appeal From: 3432 Civil 2011 (Monroe)
Disposition: Reversed and
Remanded.