rejecting Government's argument that Court of International Trade lacked jurisdiction, where state authority's refusal to award TAA benefits to individual worker was due to "the terms of the Labor Department's certification," which were not in accordance with law
Summary of this case from Former Employees of BMC Software, Inc. v. United States Secretary of LaborNo. 90-1435.
January 14, 1991
N.D.Tex.
Federal Circuit Rule 36.
rejecting Government's argument that Court of International Trade lacked jurisdiction, where state authority's refusal to award TAA benefits to individual worker was due to "the terms of the Labor Department's certification," which were not in accordance with law
Summary of this case from Former Employees of BMC Software, Inc. v. United States Secretary of LaborFull title:American Sterilizer Co. v. Surgikos, Inc
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Date published: Jan 14, 1991
The Board determined that Arenal's service as a laborer and carpenter qualified as creditable service under…
Wiggins v. National Gallery of ArtThis analysis comports with Board statements that no unfettered right to disregard orders exists, even where…