Opinion
89-AB-1164; CA A62421
Argued and submitted May 4, 1990,
Affirmed February 6, 1991
Judicial Review from Employment Appeals Board.
Kathy A. Peck, Salem, argued the cause for petitioner. With her on the brief were Ronald Atwood and Williams, Zografos Peck, Salem.
Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and Jerome Lidz, Assistant Attorney General, waived appearance for respondent Employment Division.
No appearance for respondent Craig A. Rawls.
Before Joseph, Chief Judge, and Riggs and Edmonds, Judges.
PER CURIAM
Affirmed. Sun Veneer v. Employment Div., 105 Or. App. 198, 804 P.2d 1174 (1991); Weyerhaeuser v. Employment Div., 105 Or. App. 233, 804 P.2d 1183 (1991).
Joseph, C.J., concurring.
Having joined in the dissent in Sun Veneer v. Employment Div., 105 Or. App. 198, 804 P.2d 1174 (1991), but having concurred in Weyerhaeuser v. Employment Div., 105 Or. App. 233, 804 P.2d 1183 (1991), I concur in the decision in this case.
Edmonds, J., joins me in concurring.