From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

American Bantam Car v. C.I.R

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nov 14, 1949
177 F.2d 513 (3d Cir. 1949)

Opinion

No. 9989.

Argued November 10, 1949.

Decided November 14, 1949.

Petition for Review of the Decision of the Tax Court of the United States.

Lee W. Eckels, Pittsburgh, Pa. (Thorp, Bostwick, Reed Armstrong, Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for petitioner.

Sumner M. Redstone, Washington, D.C. (Theron Lamar Caudle, Assistant Attorney General, Ellis N. Slack, Special Assistant to the Attorney General on the brief), for respondent.

Norman H. Gerlach, Chicago, Ill., amicus curiae.

Before MARIS, GOODRICH and O'CONNELL, Circuit Judges.


The controlling question in this case is whether the exchange under which the assets of the taxpayer corporation were acquired upon its organization in exchange for its stock was one in which neither gain nor loss was to be recognized under Section 112(b) (5) of the Revenue Act of 1936, 26 U.S.C.A. § 112(b)(5). We are satisfied for the reasons well stated in the opinion filed by Judge Hill for the Tax Court in banc, 11 T.C. 397, that the transaction in question was such an exchange and that the assets accordingly took in the hands of the corporation the basis which they had in the hands of the transferors pursuant to Section 113(a)(8)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C.A. § 113(a) (8)(A).

The decision of the Tax Court will be affirmed.


Summaries of

American Bantam Car v. C.I.R

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nov 14, 1949
177 F.2d 513 (3d Cir. 1949)
Case details for

American Bantam Car v. C.I.R

Case Details

Full title:AMERICAN BANTAM CAR COMPANY, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit

Date published: Nov 14, 1949

Citations

177 F.2d 513 (3d Cir. 1949)

Citing Cases

Stanton v. United States

That his business judgment strongly suggested the wisdom of a gift of 49% to his wife in no way lessened his…