From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ament v. Church of Annunciation of Elma

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 4, 1998
247 A.D.2d 843 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

February 4, 1998

Present — Denman, P.J., Green, Pine, Balio and Fallon, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied defendant's motion for a change of venue pursuant to CPLR 510 (3). Defendant failed to "indicate in some detail" the testimony that the witnesses expected to be called would give and offered only vague assertions concerning the court calendars in the counties involved ( Rodriguez v. St. Paul's Catholic Church, 162 A.D.2d 1017; see, Abbadonza v. Brown, 186 A.D.2d 1011; Schapiro Reich v. Fuchsberg, 172 A.D.2d 1080). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Bergin, J. — Venue.)


Summaries of

Ament v. Church of Annunciation of Elma

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 4, 1998
247 A.D.2d 843 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Ament v. Church of Annunciation of Elma

Case Details

Full title:MARY C. AMENT et al., Respondents, v. CHURCH OF THE ANNUNCIATION OF ELMA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Feb 4, 1998

Citations

247 A.D.2d 843 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
668 N.Y.S.2d 140

Citing Cases

Stratton v. Dueppengiesser

"While calendar congestion is certainly a factor to be considered in deciding a motion to change venue…

Mees v. Buiter

These observations, however, are irrelevant to whether that litigation, already reduced to a judgment,…