From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Amazon.com v. Robojap Techs.

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Nov 12, 2021
20-cv-00694-MJP (W.D. Wash. Nov. 12, 2021)

Opinion

20-cv-00694-MJP

11-12-2021

AMAZON.COM, INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. ROBOJAP TECHNOLOGIES LLC, a Washington limited liability company; SANDEEP SINGH, an individual; QUATIC SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD., a foreign company; HITESH KUMAR SACHDEVA, an individual; and GUREEN PAWAR, an individual, Defendants.

Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, Attorneys for Plaintiff Amazon.com Inc., Bonnie MacNaughton, WSBA #36110, Tim Cunningham, WSBA #50224. NOLD MUCHINSKY PLLC, Attorneys for Defendants Robojap Technologies LLC and Sandeep Singh, Brian M. Muchinsky, WSBA #31860, Brittany J. Faulkner, WSBA #54457.


Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, Attorneys for Plaintiff Amazon.com Inc., Bonnie MacNaughton, WSBA #36110, Tim Cunningham, WSBA #50224.

NOLD MUCHINSKY PLLC, Attorneys for Defendants Robojap Technologies LLC and Sandeep Singh, Brian M. Muchinsky, WSBA #31860, Brittany J. Faulkner, WSBA #54457.

STIPULATED PERMANENT INJUNCTION AS TO DEFENDANTS ROBOJAP TECHNOLOGIES LLC AND SANDEEP SINGH AND ORDER

Marsha J. Pechman, United States Senior District Judge.

STIPULATION

Plaintiff Amazon.com, Inc. (“Amazon”) and Defendants Robojap Technologies LLC (“Robojap”) and Sandeep Singh (“Singh”) (collectively “Settling Parties”), by and through their respective counsel of record, notify the Court that the Settling Parties have reached a settlement of all claims between them in this matter. Pursuant to the terms of that settlement, the Settling Parties stipulate and agree to entry of the permanent injunction below.

PERMANENT INJUNCTION

Pursuant to the above stipulation of the parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants Robojap and Singh, and their respective employees, agents, successors and assigns, and all others in active concert or participation with them, are permanently enjoined and restrained from:

1. Using counterfeit versions of any trademarks registered by Amazon (or its subsidiary, Amazon Technologies, Inc.) as of this injunction's entry date with any advertising, marketing, offer for sale, promotion, display, publication, website, voicemail, email, or software;

2. Using any false designation of origin or false or misleading description or false or misleading representation that can or is likely to lead the trade or public or individuals erroneously to believe that any website, social media page, voicemail, email, advertising, or other marketing materials has been produced, distributed, displayed, licensed, sponsored, approved or authorized by or for Amazon, when such is not true in fact;

3. Engaging in any other activity constituting an infringement or dilution of any trademarks registered by Amazon (or its subsidiary, Amazon Technologies, Inc.);

4. Registering or using any website domain names that involve trademarks registered by Amazon (or its subsidiary, Amazon Technologies, Inc.);

5. Engaging in any activity that defrauds individuals into paying money for Amazon services;

6. Providing any services relating to Amazon products or technology, whether directly or indirectly, including providing payment processing services to Quatic Software Solutions Pvt. Ltd. (“Quatic”), any company controlled by any Quatic director, and any other company purporting to provide (whether actually providing or not) technical support services; and

7. Knowingly and materially assisting any other person or business entity in engaging in or performing any of the activities listed above.

The Court shall retain continuing jurisdiction over this matter for the limited purposes of enforcing the terms of the Settling Parties' settlement agreement and this Stipulated Permanent Injunction.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Amazon.com v. Robojap Techs.

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Nov 12, 2021
20-cv-00694-MJP (W.D. Wash. Nov. 12, 2021)
Case details for

Amazon.com v. Robojap Techs.

Case Details

Full title:AMAZON.COM, INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. ROBOJAP…

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: Nov 12, 2021

Citations

20-cv-00694-MJP (W.D. Wash. Nov. 12, 2021)

Citing Cases

Amazon.com v. Zhenyong Dong

Moreover, Defendants' failure to appear “suggests that their infringing behavior may continue absent an…

Amazon.com v. White

Moreover, Defendants' failure to appear suggests that their infringing behavior may continue. See Amazon.com…