From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Amaker v. Fischer

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Dec 27, 2013
112 A.D.3d 1371 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-12-27

In the Matter of Anthony AMAKER, Petitioner–Appellant, v. Brian FISCHER, Commissioner, New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent–Respondent.

Wyoming County–Attica Legal Aid Bureau, Warsaw (Adam W. Koch of Counsel), for Petitioner–Appellant. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of Counsel), for Respondent–Respondent.



Wyoming County–Attica Legal Aid Bureau, Warsaw (Adam W. Koch of Counsel), for Petitioner–Appellant. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of Counsel), for Respondent–Respondent.
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., FAHEY, LINDLEY, VALENTINO AND WHALEN, JJ.

MEMORANDUM:

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking to annul the determination that he violated three inmate rules. Contrary to petitioner's contention, the record does not establish that the Hearing Officer was biased or that the determination flowed from the alleged bias ( see Matter of Rodriguez v. Herbert, 270 A.D.2d 889, 890, 706 N.Y.S.2d 284). Also contrary to petitioner's contention, the Hearing Officer did not improperly deny petitioner his right to call the superintendent of the facility or the pharmacist as witnesses inasmuch as the subject of their proposed testimony was irrelevant to the proceedings ( see Matter of Lewis v. Lape, 90 A.D.3d 1259, 1260, 934 N.Y.S.2d 358, lv. denied18 N.Y.3d 809, 2012 WL 1033692). Finally, petitioner's contention that he should have been able to admit Directive 4910 in evidence because the search was improper is not properly before us, inasmuch as he failed to exhaust his administrative remedies with respect to that contention ( see Matter of Kearney v. Village of Cold Spring Zoning Bd. of Appeals, 83 A.D.3d 711, 713, 920 N.Y.S.2d 379), and we conclude that the Hearing Officer did not act improperly in removing petitioner from the hearing ( see Matter of Barnes v. Prack, 101 A.D.3d 1277, 1278, 955 N.Y.S.2d 447).

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.


Summaries of

Amaker v. Fischer

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Dec 27, 2013
112 A.D.3d 1371 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

Amaker v. Fischer

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Anthony AMAKER, Petitioner–Appellant, v. Brian FISCHER…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Dec 27, 2013

Citations

112 A.D.3d 1371 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
112 A.D.3d 1371
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 8762

Citing Cases

Smith v. Annucci

To the extent other witness testimony or exhibits conflicted with the supervising officer's testimony, that…

Jay v. Fischer

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking to annul the determination that he violated…