From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Alvis v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Aug 9, 2000
764 So. 2d 859 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. 3D99-2983

Opinion filed August 9, 2000. JULY TERM, A.D. 2000

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Roberto Pineiro, Judge, L.T. No. 98-34767.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Robert Godfrey, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General and Jan E. Vair, Assistant Attorney General (Fort Lauderdale), for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and GODERICH and SORONDO, JJ.


The defendant appeals from two separate judgments and sentences for direct criminal contempt based on his use of obscene language in open court. While the evidence justifies findings that in each instance, Alvis was indeed criminally contemptuous, see R.C. v. State, 648 So.2d 1258 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995), review denied, 659 So.2d 1088 (Fla. 1995), citing Best v. State, 648 So.2d 734 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994); Martinez v. State, 339 So.2d 1133 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976), approved, 346 So.2d 68 (Fla. 1977), the record shows that the trial judge did not comply with Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.830 on either occasion, see Poitier v. Spears, 750 So.2d 767 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000); Cook v. State, 636 So.2d 895 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994). The convictions and sentences are therefore vacated and the cause is remanded for the trial court, if it wishes, to conduct further proceedings in accordance with the rule. See Martin v. State, 711 So.2d 1173 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998).


Summaries of

Alvis v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Aug 9, 2000
764 So. 2d 859 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

Alvis v. State

Case Details

Full title:FREDRICK BERNARD ALVIS, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Aug 9, 2000

Citations

764 So. 2d 859 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Citing Cases

Rudolph v. State

A trial court's decision to sanction an attorney for trial misconduct is reviewed under an abuse of…

Rhoads v. State

"The provisions of rule 3.830 define the essence of due process in criminal contempt proceedings and must be…