From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Alvarez v. N.Y. State Div. of Parole

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 18, 2009
63 A.D.3d 1402 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

June 18, 2009.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Garry, J.), entered September 12, 2008 in Chemung County, which dismissed petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Board of Parole denying petitioner's request for parole release.

Before: Mercure, J.P., Rose, Malone Jr., Kavanagh and McCarthy, JJ., concur.


Petitioner, who is serving a prison sentence of 15 years to life upon his conviction of murder in the second degree, commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging an April 2007 determination of the Board of Parole denying his request for parole release. Following joinder of issue, Supreme Court dismissed the petition. Petitioner now appeals.

The Attorney General has advised that petitioner reappeared before the Board in March 2009 at which time his request for parole release was again denied. In view of this, petitioner's appeal is moot and must be dismissed ( see Matter of Johnson v New York State Div. of Parole, 54 AD3d 464, 465, lv denied 11 NY3d 711).

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.


Summaries of

Alvarez v. N.Y. State Div. of Parole

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 18, 2009
63 A.D.3d 1402 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

Alvarez v. N.Y. State Div. of Parole

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of RAMON ALVAREZ, Appellant, v. NEW YORK STATE DIVISION OF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jun 18, 2009

Citations

63 A.D.3d 1402 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
880 N.Y.S.2d 582

Citing Cases

In re Ronald Rivers

The Attorney General has advised this Court that petitioner reappeared before the Board in August 2008 at…

In re Raymond Alvarez

Although petitioner advises that he did not attend and that the hearing was held in his absence, there is no…