From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Alternate Energy Management Corp. v. Goodman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 5, 1989
151 A.D.2d 453 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

June 5, 1989

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Ruskin, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We agree with the Supreme Court, Westchester County, that prior to the filing of a bankruptcy petition by the judgment debtor the petitioner obtained a valid lien on the premises by delivering a transcript of the judgment entered in the Supreme Court, New York County, to the Westchester County Clerk (CPLR 5203). A leasehold is assignable and therefore may be applied to the judgment (CPLR 5201). Moreover, as a chattel real, a leasehold is characterized by the CPLR as real property (CPLR 105 [s]) which can be encumbered by a lien.

The petitioner properly sought relief in State court, as the automatic stay of enforcement proceedings available under the Federal bankruptcy law applies only to property of the bankrupt's estate ( 11 U.S.C. § 362 [a] [4]). Once Goodman and Fontana purchased the leasehold from the interim trustee in bankruptcy, it no longer belonged to the estate.

The order of the United States Bankruptcy Court approving the sale and assignment of the leasehold to Goodman and Fontana is silent as to existing liens on the leasehold. Consequently, the petitioner's lien was not extinguished and may be enforced (see, 4B Collier, Bankruptcy ¶ 70.97 [2] [14th ed]).

We have examined the parties' remaining contentions and find that they lack merit. Mollen, P.J., Mangano, Kunzeman and Balletta, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Alternate Energy Management Corp. v. Goodman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 5, 1989
151 A.D.2d 453 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

Alternate Energy Management Corp. v. Goodman

Case Details

Full title:ALTERNATE ENERGY MANAGEMENT CORP., Respondent-Appellant, v. ALLEN M…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 5, 1989

Citations

151 A.D.2d 453 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
542 N.Y.S.2d 242

Citing Cases

Herkimer Cnty. Indus. Dev. Agency v. Vill. of Herkimer

The Village contends that the County used an improper basis for its determination to withdraw the properties…

Gerrity Company, Inc. v. Riscica

Riscica's assertions that plaintiff is barred from foreclosure as a matter of law because of (1) Immediato's…