From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Alston v. Voorhies

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Dec 5, 2007
CASE NO. 1:07CV02284 (N.D. Ohio Dec. 5, 2007)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:07CV02284.

December 5, 2007


ORDER


Petitioner has filed several motions requesting transcripts and other records related to his state court conviction. (Doc. Nos. 3, 5, 6, 11.) For the following reasons, Petitioner's motions (Doc. Nos. 3, 5, 6, 11) are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.

Petitioner seeks the following documents: (1) indictment; (2) pretrial hearings; (3) trial proceedings (voir dire, trial, closing arguments, instructions); (4) sentencing and judgment of conviction; (5) all exhibits; and (6) all briefs, decisions, and entries filed in connection with the appeal of the judgment. (Doc. No. 6 at 2.) Respondent is ordered to file the requested documents as attachments to the return of writ. With the exception of the trial transcript, Respondent is further ordered to serve these attachments on Petitioner along with service of the return of writ. Thus, Petitioner's request for the documents other than the trial transcript is GRANTED.

To the extent Petitioner seeks the trial transcript, the motion is DENIED at this time. If Petitioner still seeks a copy of the trial transcript after Respondent files a return of writ, Petitioner may file another motion requesting it. However, the Court will not entertain a request for an entire trial transcript absent a showing of neccessity. Petitioner must demonstrate a particularized need for the transcript — that is, Petitioner must explain with sufficient specificity, why the transcript is necessary to his claims and/or to his reply to Respondent's arguments.

For the foregoing reasons, Petitioner's motions (Doc. Nos. 3, 5, 6, 11) are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Alston v. Voorhies

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Dec 5, 2007
CASE NO. 1:07CV02284 (N.D. Ohio Dec. 5, 2007)
Case details for

Alston v. Voorhies

Case Details

Full title:MARK ALSTON, Petitioner, v. ED VOORHIES, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Dec 5, 2007

Citations

CASE NO. 1:07CV02284 (N.D. Ohio Dec. 5, 2007)

Citing Cases

Pollard v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

"A general objection, or one that merely restates the arguments previously presented is not sufficient to…

Aladimi v. Hamilton Cnty. Justice Ctr.

Furthermore, "[v]erbatim restatements of arguments addressed by the magistrate judge are not proper…