From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Alsobrook v. GMAC Mortg., LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
May 9, 2012
Civil Action No. 3:11-CV-00603-M (BF) (N.D. Tex. May. 9, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 3:11-CV-00603-M (BF)

05-09-2012

COURTNEY D. ALSOBROOK, Plaintiff, v. GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC, and EXECUTIVE TRUSTEE SERVICES, LLC, Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND

RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The Court has under consideration the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Paul D. Stickney. The District Court reviewed the proposed Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court accepts the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

Accordingly, Defendants', GMAC Mortgage, LLC ("GMAC") and Executive Trustee Services, LLC ("ETS"), Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. 26) is GRANTED and Plaintiff's claims against Defendants GMAC and ETS are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

Furthermore, the Court DENIES as MOOT Defendants', GMAC and ETS, Motion to Dissolve Temporary Restraining Order (doc. 33), and Defendants', GMAC and ETS, Motion To Grant Defendants' Pending Motions (doc. 42). Finally, the Court DENIES Plaintiff's Motion to Remand and Brief in Support (doc. 36).

_________________

BARBARA M. G. LYNN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS


Summaries of

Alsobrook v. GMAC Mortg., LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
May 9, 2012
Civil Action No. 3:11-CV-00603-M (BF) (N.D. Tex. May. 9, 2012)
Case details for

Alsobrook v. GMAC Mortg., LLC

Case Details

Full title:COURTNEY D. ALSOBROOK, Plaintiff, v. GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC, and EXECUTIVE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: May 9, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 3:11-CV-00603-M (BF) (N.D. Tex. May. 9, 2012)

Citing Cases

Bailey v. Bac Home Loans Servicing, LP

"[A] borrower has no private right of action under MHA or HAMP." Dempsey v. U.S. Bank Nat., 2012 WL 2036434,…