From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Alro Metals v. Pullins

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jun 15, 1984
451 So. 2d 1001 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

Opinion

No. AW-256.

June 15, 1984.

Appeal from the Deputy Commissioner.

Anthony J. Beisler, III, Fort Lauderdale, for appellants.

Emil Jaczynski, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.


The employer and carrier appeal the deputy commissioner's order awarding wage-loss benefits from December 1, 1980, to September 1, 1981. With the single exception noted below, we find the order is supported by competent and substantial evidence.

The order allows wage-loss benefits commencing December 1, 1980. The claim alleged benefits were due commencing December 14. The undisputed evidence shows that claimant was employed until December 18. The order is hereby modified to commence benefits on December 18. Ordinarily, we would not correct this discrepancy on appeal because it could have, and indeed should have, been brought to the attention of the deputy within the thirty-day statutory period before becoming final. E.g., Juma Construction v. Villaneuva, 437 So.2d 715 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); Sunland Hospital v. Garrett, 415 So.2d 783 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); § 440.25(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (1981). We do so only because claimant concedes this error.

The only error demonstrated by appellants should have been presented to the deputy for correction. The other contentions of appellants are so lacking in merit as to render this appeal frivolous. A fee in the amount of $2,000 is allowed for the services of claimant's attorney.

The appealed order, as modified, is AFFIRMED.

SMITH and JOANOS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Alro Metals v. Pullins

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jun 15, 1984
451 So. 2d 1001 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)
Case details for

Alro Metals v. Pullins

Case Details

Full title:ALRO METALS AND HOME INDEMNITY COMPANY, APPELLANTS, v. CHARLES PULLINS…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Jun 15, 1984

Citations

451 So. 2d 1001 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

Citing Cases

Vic Potamkin Chevrolet v. Hernandez

The fee award here, as the court found in Bird, "appears on the evidence to be properly assessed." Additional…

Crown Carpentry, Inc. v. Guillen

In light of these incongruities we reverse the MMI finding and remand to the DC for a MMI finding which…