From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Almonte v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 13, 2002
295 A.D.2d 715 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

89640

June 13, 2002.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Marco Almonte, Pine City, petitioner pro se.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, Albany (Peter G. Crary of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Peters, Carpinello and, Rose, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule that prohibits inmates from soliciting others to smuggle contraband into a correctional facility. As related in the misbehavior report, confidential information was presented to correction officers indicating that petitioner had been communicating with certain individuals outside the facility, asking them to bring him razor blades and handcuff keys the next time they visited so that he would be able to carry out an assault on another inmate.

Our in camera review of the record leads us to conclude that the determination of petitioner's guilt was supported by substantial evidence in the form of the misbehavior report and the transcript of a taped interview conducted by the Hearing Officer with a correction officer who had received the confidential information and the corroborating physical evidence (see, Matter of Colon v. Goord, 245 A.D.2d 582, 584; Matter of Feliciano v. Selsky, 239 A.D.2d 799). A prison disciplinary determination may be based upon confidential information provided that the Hearing Officer has made an independent assessment of its reliability, as was done in this matter (see, Matter of Abdur-Raheem v. Mann, 85 N.Y.2d 113, 119; Matter of Gardiner v. Senkowski, 234 A.D.2d 708). Petitioner's remaining contentions, including his assertions of Hearing Officer bias, have been reviewed and found to be without merit.

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Peters, Carpinello and Rose, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Almonte v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 13, 2002
295 A.D.2d 715 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

Almonte v. Goord

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of MARCO ALMONTE, Petitioner, v. GLENN S. GOORD, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jun 13, 2002

Citations

295 A.D.2d 715 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
743 N.Y.S.2d 328

Citing Cases

Simpson v. Goord

Upon questioning, she stated that petitioner had solicited her to bring him drugs on several occasions and…

Moore v. Miller

Petitioner asserts that the Hearing Officer did not assess the reliability of the confidential informants.…