Summary
holding that a lack of due diligence in factually investigating a claim prevented the party from relying on the third category of contra non valentem doctrine
Summary of this case from Union Pac. R.R. Co. v. Morel G. Lemoine Distribs.Opinion
No. 2009-C-2275.
January 29, 2010.
Prior report: La.App., 18 So.3d 172.
In re Colony Insurance Company; L L Import Enterprises Inc. d/b/a; Van Troxel International Inc.; — Defendant(s); Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court Div. C, No. 483,742; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 44,508-CA.
Writ granted. We reverse the court of appeal decision finding the doctrine of contra non valentem applicable to the facts presented. The court of appeal erred in finding Allstate's delay "cannot be attributable to its own neglect," an essential element in a defense to prescription based on this doctrine. Allstate's two-year delay between its discovery request and its motion to compel, plus an additional year before adding Colony to the suit, evidences a lack of due diligence on the part of Allstate, precluding application of the contra non valentem doctrine. Accordingly, we reverse the decision of the court of appeal and remand to the court of appeal for consideration of pretermitted issues not addressed in the original opinion.
JOHNSON, J., would deny.
WEIMER, J., would deny.