concluding that Minnesota court constitutionally may apply Minnesota law even though suit more significantly connected with Wisconsin
Summary of this case from Ott v. Kaiser-Georgetown Community Health Plan, Inc.Nos. 79-938, 80-529.
March 2, 1981.
Petitions for rehearing denied. JUSTICE STEWART took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions.
concluding that Minnesota court constitutionally may apply Minnesota law even though suit more significantly connected with Wisconsin
Summary of this case from Ott v. Kaiser-Georgetown Community Health Plan, Inc.Full title:ALLSTATE INSURANCE CO. v. HAGUE, PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF HAGUE'S…
Court:U.S.
Date published: Mar 2, 1981
"Kansas must have a `significant contact or aggregation of contacts' to the claims asserted by each member of…
Medtronic, Inc. v. Catalyst Research Corp.Such increased damages are within the Court's discretion to award, see Milgo Electronic Corp. v. United…