Allord v. Henry Muhs Co.

Full title: ARTHUR ALLORD, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. THE HENRY MUHS COMPANY…

Court: Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Sep 27, 1933

168 A. 298 (N.J. 1933)

168 A. 298

Opinion

Submitted May 27, 1933 —

Decided September 27, 1933.

On appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, whose opinion is printed in 10 N.J. Mis. R. 1230.

For the petitioner-respondent, W. Reading Gebhardt.

For the respondent-appellant, Cox Walburg ( Harry E. Walburg and Arthur F. Mead, of counsel).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment under review herein is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion filed in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, CASE, HEHER, PERSKIE, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, DILL, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.