Opinion
Argued April 14, 1891
Decided April 28, 1891
William N. Dykman for appellant.
Richard S. Newcombe for respondent.
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Alliger v. Brooklyn Daily Eagle
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 28, 1891
27 N.E. 856 (N.Y. 1891)
Summaries of
Alliger v. Brooklyn Daily Eagle
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 28, 1891
27 N.E. 856 (N.Y. 1891)
Case details for
Alliger v. Brooklyn Daily Eagle
Case Details
Full title:RICHARD D. ALLIGER, Respondent, v . THE BROOKLYN DAILY EAGLE, Appellant
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Apr 28, 1891
Citations
27 N.E. 856 (N.Y. 1891)
127 N.Y. 651
37 N.Y. St. Rptr. 966
Citing Cases
Smith v. Matthews
In order to justify this claim it should appear that the jury was actuated by passion, prejudice or…
Smith v. MatthewsIn many it has been denied. Coleman v. Southwick, 9 Johns. 51; Fry v. Bennett, 9 Abb. 53; Whiteman v. Leslie,…