From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Allen v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Jun 30, 1925
104 So. 867 (Ala. Crim. App. 1925)

Opinion

8 Div. 298.

June 30, 1925.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Madison County; James E. Horton, Judge.

Peter Allen was convicted of violating the prohibition laws, and he appeals. Reversed and remanded.

Douglass Taylor, of Huntsville, for appellant.

Harwell G. Davis, Atty. Gen., for the State.


The defendant was convicted of violating the prohibition laws, and appeals.

The evidence for the state was that three officers searched defendant's premises some time in the afternoon, while he was away from home, and "found three Coco-Cola bottles full of whisky in the coalhouse — two in the coal pile, and one in a basket or box — the coalhouse being unlocked at the time." The defendant denied any knowledge of, or ownership in, the whisky.

There is no necessity for our citing a lot of decisions or indulging in a long discussion of this evidence. It was not sufficient to overcome the presumption of innocence attending the defendant, and the general affirmative charge duly requested should have been given in his favor. The circumstances showing guilt in the case of Connor v. State, 19 Ala. App. 444, 98 So. 482, were much stronger than here, and that case does not militate against our holding.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

Allen v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Jun 30, 1925
104 So. 867 (Ala. Crim. App. 1925)
Case details for

Allen v. State

Case Details

Full title:ALLEN v. STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Jun 30, 1925

Citations

104 So. 867 (Ala. Crim. App. 1925)
21 Ala. App. 23

Citing Cases

Jacobs v. State

The finding of prohibited liquor upon the premises of accused is insufficient to warrant a conviction, in the…

Buckner v. State

ll City, for appellant. Evidence not a part of the res gestæ and not connected with the offense charged is…