From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Allen v. Kingwood Apartments

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Feb 22, 2022
No. 21-2108 (4th Cir. Feb. 22, 2022)

Opinion

21-2108

02-22-2022

DERRICK MICHAEL ALLEN, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. KINGWOOD APARTMENTS; IAN DEL TORO, Leasing Consultant; GSC; SHANNON BRUMMETT, Regional Property Manager; SUSAN DAVIS; JON PEREL; G. TERRY MEYERS; DONNA GRIFFIN, Defendants - Appellees.

Derrick Michael Allen, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Submitted: February 17, 2022

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder, Chief District Judge. (1:19-cv-00992-TDS-LPA)

Derrick Michael Allen, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.

Before AGEE and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM

Derrick Michael Allen, Sr., appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Allen's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Allen v. Kingwood Apartments, No. 1:19-cv-00992-TDS-LPA (M.D. N.C. Sept. 29, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Allen v. Kingwood Apartments

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Feb 22, 2022
No. 21-2108 (4th Cir. Feb. 22, 2022)
Case details for

Allen v. Kingwood Apartments

Case Details

Full title:DERRICK MICHAEL ALLEN, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. KINGWOOD APARTMENTS…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Feb 22, 2022

Citations

No. 21-2108 (4th Cir. Feb. 22, 2022)

Citing Cases

Reaves v. Richmond Cnty. Sheriff's Office

Any such claims fail as a matter of law; there is no private right of action under the users statute. See…

Reaves v. Richmond Cnty. Sheriff Office

Any such claims fail as a matter of law; there is no private right of action under the users statute. See…