From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Allen v. Heath

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION
May 27, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:16-cv-51 MHS-JDL (E.D. Tex. May. 27, 2016)

Summary

finding that the TCPA's basis for dismissal is substantive and does not conflict with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

Summary of this case from Sw. Airlines Co. v. Roundpipe, LLC

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:16-cv-51 MHS-JDL

05-27-2016

AMANDA ALLEN, Plaintiff, v. DR. JOE DONALD HEATH, in his individual and official capacities, HANNAH HEARN, and NWPROPERTY MANAGEMENT, LLC d/b/a NWP MANAGEMENT, Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On May 6, 2016, United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love issued a Report and Recommendation, recommending that the undersigned GRANT-IN-PART and DENY-IN-PART Defendants Hannah Hearn ("Defendant" or "Ms. Hearn") and NWProperty Management, LLC's ("Defendant" or "NWP") (collectively "Defendants") Motion to Dismiss pursuant to the Texas Citizens Participation Act ("TCPA") (Doc. No. 3). (Doc. No. 52.) Specifically, the Magistrate Judge recommended granting Defendants' motion with respect to Plaintiff's negligence claim, but recommended denying the motion with respect to Plaintiff's defamation and tortious interference claims. (Doc. No. 52, at 8-16.) No objections to the Report and Recommendation were filed during the prescribed objection period.

The Court, having reviewed the Magistrate Judge's findings and conclusions, is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct. Therefore, the Court hereby adopts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge as the findings and conclusions of the Court. It is accordingly ORDERED that Defendants' Motion (Doc. No. 3) is GRANTED with respect to Plaintiff's negligence claim and DENIED with respect to Plaintiff's tortious interference and defamation claims. It is further ORDERED that the related motion to stay (Doc. No. 14) be DENIED as moot. SIGNED this 27th day of May, 2016.

/s/_________

MICHAEL H. SCHNEIDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Allen v. Heath

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION
May 27, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:16-cv-51 MHS-JDL (E.D. Tex. May. 27, 2016)

finding that the TCPA's basis for dismissal is substantive and does not conflict with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

Summary of this case from Sw. Airlines Co. v. Roundpipe, LLC

finding that the TCPA's basis for dismissal is substantive and does not conflict with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

Summary of this case from N.P.U., Inc. v. Wilson Audio Specialties, Inc.
Case details for

Allen v. Heath

Case Details

Full title:AMANDA ALLEN, Plaintiff, v. DR. JOE DONALD HEATH, in his individual and…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Date published: May 27, 2016

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:16-cv-51 MHS-JDL (E.D. Tex. May. 27, 2016)

Citing Cases

Sw. Airlines Co. v. Roundpipe, LLC

N.P.U., Inc. d/b/a NE Plus Ultra v. Wilson Audio Specialties, Inc. , 343 F.Supp.3d 661, 665 (W.D. Tex. 2018)…

N.P.U., Inc. v. Wilson Audio Specialties, Inc.

); Cuba v. Pylant , 814 F.3d 701, 706 (5th Cir. 2016) (assuming without deciding that the TCPA's procedural…