From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Alizio v. Alizio

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 23, 2002
300 A.D.2d 515 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

2002-04283

December 4, 2002.

December 23, 2002.

In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring, in effect, that the election of the individual defendants to the Board of Directors of the defendant 82-04 Lefferts Tenants Corp. was illegal, the plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Milano, J.), dated January 18, 2002, as denied that branch of his motion which was to strike the answer of the defendant Joseph Alizio.

Bracken, Margolin Gouvis, LLP, Islandia, N.Y. (Jeffrey D. Powell of counsel), for appellant.

Richard B. Feldman, PLLC, New York, N.Y., for respondent.

Before: MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, J.P., SONDRA MILLER, LEO F. McGINITY, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, REINALDO E. RIVERA, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, as a matter of discretion, with costs, and that branch of the motion which was to strike the answer of the defendant Joseph Alizio is granted.

The nature and degree of the penalty to be imposed pursuant to CPLR 3126 against a party who "refuses to obey an order for disclosure or wilfully fails to disclose information which the court finds ought to have been disclosed" is a matter within the discretion of the Supreme Court (CPLR 3126; see Zletz v. Wetanson, 67 N.Y.2d 711). The wilful and contumacious conduct of the defendant Joseph Alizio may be inferred from his repeated failure, over a period of three years, to comply with numerous court orders requiring production of documents and his failure to appear at depositions without adequate excuse (see Dacey v. Horror Cafe, 293 A.D.2d 511; Nowak v. Veira, 289 A.D.2d 383). Accordingly, the Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in denying that branch of the plaintiff's motion which was to strike the answer of the defendant Joseph Alizio.

ALTMAN, J.P., S. MILLER, McGINITY, SCHMIDT and RIVERA, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Alizio v. Alizio

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 23, 2002
300 A.D.2d 515 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

Alizio v. Alizio

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY ALIZIO, ETC., appellant, v. JOSEPH ALIZIO, ETC., respondent, et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 23, 2002

Citations

300 A.D.2d 515 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
752 N.Y.S.2d 553

Citing Cases

Ziskin Law Firm v. Bi-County Elec

The record demonstrates that the defendants failed without reasonable excuse to comply with multiple…

Williams v. New Style Limousine, Inc.

Parenthetically, should you ask, what did defendant Masih gain by appearing at the deposition of December…