From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ali v. Hogan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Dec 2, 2014
No. 9:12-CV-104 (N.D.N.Y. Dec. 2, 2014)

Opinion

No. 9:12-CV-104

12-02-2014

JAMAAL ALI, Plaintiff, v. DR. MICHAEL F. HOGAN, Commissioner, New York State Office of Mental Health; DR. DONALD SAWYER, Executive Director; and DR. TERRI MAXYMILLIAN, Sex Offender Treatment Program Director; Central New York Psychiatric Center, Defendants.

APPEARANCES: JAMAAL ALI Plaintiff Pro Se 29635 CNY PC PO Box 300 Marcy, NY 13403 HON. ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN New York State Attorney General Attorney for Defendants The Capitol Albany, NY 12224 OF COUNSEL: MELISSA A. LATINO, ESQ. Ass't Attorney General


APPEARANCES: JAMAAL ALI
Plaintiff Pro Se
29635
CNY PC
PO Box 300
Marcy, NY 13403
HON. ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN
New York State Attorney General
Attorney for Defendants
The Capitol
Albany, NY 12224
OF COUNSEL: MELISSA A. LATINO, ESQ.
Ass't Attorney General
DAVID N. HURD
United States District Judge
DECISION and ORDER

Pro se plaintiff Jamaal Ali brought this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, as well as Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. ("ADA") Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 794(a) ("Rehabilitation Act"), New York Mental Hygiene Law Section 7.18, and New York Human Rights Law Section 290 et seq. On October 31, 2014, the Honorable Randolph F. Treece, United States Magistrate Judge, advised by Report-Recommendation that defendants' motion for summary judgment be granted, plaintiff's remaining ADA and Rehabilitation Act claims be dismissed, and supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiff's state law claims be declined pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367. No objections to the Report-Recommendation were filed.

Based upon a careful review of the entire file and the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge, the Report-Recommendation is accepted in whole. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

Therefore, it is

ORDERED that

1. Plaintiff's remaining ADA and Rehabilitation Act claims are DISMISSED;

2. Supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining state law claims is declined pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367 and those claims are DISMISSED without prejudice;

3. The complaint is DISMISSED in its entirety; and

4. The Clerk close the file and serve a copy of this Decision and Order on plaintiff.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/_________

United States District Judge
Dated: December 2, 2014

Utica, New York.


Summaries of

Ali v. Hogan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Dec 2, 2014
No. 9:12-CV-104 (N.D.N.Y. Dec. 2, 2014)
Case details for

Ali v. Hogan

Case Details

Full title:JAMAAL ALI, Plaintiff, v. DR. MICHAEL F. HOGAN, Commissioner, New York…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Dec 2, 2014

Citations

No. 9:12-CV-104 (N.D.N.Y. Dec. 2, 2014)

Citing Cases

Woods v. Tompkins Cnty.

"Claims alleging disability discrimination in violation of the ADA are subject to the burden-shifting…