From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Alexander v. Perrill

United States District Court, D. Arizona
Jan 3, 1995
872 F. Supp. 722 (D. Ariz. 1995)

Opinion

No. CIV 87-582 TUC RMB

January 3, 1995.

A. Bates Butler, III, Tucson, AZ, for plaintiff.

Janet Napolitano, U.S. Atty., Phoenix, AZ, Eugene R. Bracamonte, Asst. U.S. Atty., Tucson, AZ, for defendants.


ORDER


Plaintiff Kent G. Alexander and Defendants William A. Perrill and Luis Rivera jointly move for an order vacating this Court's July 8, 1994 Amended Final Judgment and its published October 27, 1993 order and memorandum opinion. See Alexander v. Perrill, 836 F. Supp. 701 (D.Ariz. 1993). While appeal was pending, the parties entered into a full and final settlement of their dispute.

After review of the joint motion and the exceptional circumstances present in this case, the Court finds that vacatur is appropriate and consistent with Ninth Circuit and United States Supreme Court precedence. See Ringsby Truck Lines, Inc. v. Western Conference of Teamsters, 686 F.2d 720 (9th Cir. 1982); U.S. Bancorp Mortgage Co. v. Bonner Mall Partnership, ___ U.S. ___, 115 S.Ct. 386, 130 L.Ed.2d 233 (1994).

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the Joint Motion to Vacate Judgment and For Dismissal with Prejudice is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Amended Final Judgment entered July 8, 1994 and the Order entered October 27, 1993 are VACATED and this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.


Summaries of

Alexander v. Perrill

United States District Court, D. Arizona
Jan 3, 1995
872 F. Supp. 722 (D. Ariz. 1995)
Case details for

Alexander v. Perrill

Case Details

Full title:Kent G. ALEXANDER, Plaintiff, v. William A. PERRILL and Luis Rivera…

Court:United States District Court, D. Arizona

Date published: Jan 3, 1995

Citations

872 F. Supp. 722 (D. Ariz. 1995)

Citing Cases

Lindsey v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company

The Court finds that there are ample exceptional circumstances justifying vacatur as requested by the…