From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Alexander v. Gooss

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Dec 9, 2013
No. 63951 (Nev. Dec. 9, 2013)

Opinion

No. 63951

12-09-2013

LAMAAR ALEXANDER; AND LAS VEGAS CONFIDENTIAL PROMOTERS, Appellants, v. JEFFREY A. GOOSS; JENNIFER M. GOOSS; TOTAL PERFORMANCE ENGINEERING; AND TOTAL PERFORMANCE MOTORSPORTS, Respondents.


An unpublished order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This proper person appeal challenges district court orders entered in the context of an appeal to the district court from a justice court decision. Our review of the documents submitted to this court pursuant to NRAP 3(g) reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, district courts have final appellate jurisdiction over cases arising in the justice courts. Nev. Const. art. 6, § 6; see also Waugh v. Casazza, 85 Nev. 520, 521, 458 P.2d 359, 360 (1969) (noting that "[t]he district court has final appellate jurisdiction in cases arising in the justice's court"). Accordingly, as we lack jurisdiction over this appeal, we

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.

_________________, J.

Gibbons
_________________, J.
Douglas
_________________, J.
Saitta
cc: Hon. Kathleen E. Delaney, District Judge

Lamaar Alexander

Christensen Law Offices, LLC

Eighth District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Alexander v. Gooss

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Dec 9, 2013
No. 63951 (Nev. Dec. 9, 2013)
Case details for

Alexander v. Gooss

Case Details

Full title:LAMAAR ALEXANDER; AND LAS VEGAS CONFIDENTIAL PROMOTERS, Appellants, v…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Dec 9, 2013

Citations

No. 63951 (Nev. Dec. 9, 2013)