From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Alex A. v. Bel Edwards

United States District Court, Middle District of Louisiana
Jul 5, 2023
Civil Action 22-573-SDD-RLB (M.D. La. Jul. 5, 2023)

Opinion

Civil Action 22-573-SDD-RLB

07-05-2023

ALEX A., by and through his guardian, MOLLY SMITH, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. GOVERNOR JON BEL EDWARDS, in his official capacity as Governor of Louisiana; WILLIAM SOMMERS, in his official capacity as Deputy Secretary of the Office of Juvenile Justice, JAMES M. LEBLANC, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Louisiana Department of Public Safety & Corrections


RULING

SHELLY D. DICK, CHIEF JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

The Court has carefully considered the record, the law applicable to this action, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Richard L. Bourgeois, Jr. dated March 28, 2023, the Plaintiffs' Objection, the Defendants' Response, and the Plaintiffs' Reply. The Court has undertaken a de novo review and adopts the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation.

Rec. Doc. 143.

Rec. Doc. 147.

Rec. Doc. 149.

Rec. Doc. 158.

Plaintiffs seek access to four non-party juveniles who are in the custody of the OJJ. The Court notes that Plaintiffs' counsel's letter to OJJ to schedule meetings with the four non-party youth detainees is not a letter of representation. The subject youth are not clients of Plaintiffs' counsel merely by virtue of their being putative class members. Hence, the Court is not presented with a situation where an attorney has been denied access to or an opportunity to meet with his/her client.

Rec. Doc. 113-4.

The argument that the named Plaintiffs, Alex A., et al., are injured by OJJ's refusal to grant access to other “similarly situated” youth is subterfuge for saying that the Plaintiffs are injured by the inability of Plaintiffs' counsel to conduct discovery. Because the nonparties are in OJJ custody, the Plaintiffs must seek access to them. However, discovery is stayed, and as juveniles in State detention, Plaintiffs are impeded from simply interviewing these non-parties. This does not present a claim of unconstitutional denial of access to counsel. For the reasons articulated by Magistrate Judge Bourgeois, the Plaintiffs lack standing to urge the subject Motion for Access to Counsel.

Rec. Doc. 118.

Rec. Doc. 113.

The Court hereby approves the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and adopts it as the Court's opinion herein.

ACCORDINGLY,

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion for Access to Counsel is DENIED.

Rec. Doc. 113.


Summaries of

Alex A. v. Bel Edwards

United States District Court, Middle District of Louisiana
Jul 5, 2023
Civil Action 22-573-SDD-RLB (M.D. La. Jul. 5, 2023)
Case details for

Alex A. v. Bel Edwards

Case Details

Full title:ALEX A., by and through his guardian, MOLLY SMITH, individually and on…

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Louisiana

Date published: Jul 5, 2023

Citations

Civil Action 22-573-SDD-RLB (M.D. La. Jul. 5, 2023)