From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Albritton v. Ellis

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Gainesville Division
Jun 21, 2011
CASE NO. 1:11-cv-00014-MP-GRJ (N.D. Fla. Jun. 21, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:11-cv-00014-MP-GRJ.

June 21, 2011


ORDER


This matter is before the Court on Doc. 3, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, recommending that this petition be dismissed as an unauthorized successive petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The petitioner has filed objections, Doc. 4, in which he claims that the instant petition is not successive because the first, in 1:00-cv-00099-MP-WCS, was dismissed as untimely under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act, rather than on the merits. This argument has been expressly rejected by the Eleventh Circuit. See, e.g., In re Hutcherson, 468 F.3d 747 (11th Cir. 2006) (deeming second petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 to be successive when the first was dismissed as untimely under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act.) Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

DONE AND ORDERED.

1. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is adopted and incorporated herein. The petition in this case is dismissed as an unauthorized successive petition. The Clerk is directed to close the file.


Summaries of

Albritton v. Ellis

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Gainesville Division
Jun 21, 2011
CASE NO. 1:11-cv-00014-MP-GRJ (N.D. Fla. Jun. 21, 2011)
Case details for

Albritton v. Ellis

Case Details

Full title:ALEXANDER M ALBRITTON, Petitioner, v. J ELLIS, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Gainesville Division

Date published: Jun 21, 2011

Citations

CASE NO. 1:11-cv-00014-MP-GRJ (N.D. Fla. Jun. 21, 2011)