From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Albert v. Solimon

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 14, 1999
94 N.Y.2d 771 (N.Y. 1999)

Opinion

Argued September 15, 1999

Decided October 14, 1999

Appeal from the Supreme Court (Eugene F. Pigott, Jr., J.).

Nira T. Kermisch, Rochester, for appellant.

Brown Tarantino, L. L. P., Rochester (Ann M. Campbell of counsel), for respondent.


Order affirmed, without costs. We agree with Supreme Court and the Appellate Division that the examination room of the medical office of the orthopedic surgeon, into which plaintiff brought her service dog, was not a "public facility" within the meaning of Civil Rights Law § 47. No other issue is before us.

Concur: Chief Judge KAYE and Judges BELLACOSA, SMITH, LEVINE, WESLEY and ROSENBLATT. Taking no part: Judge CIPARICK.


Summaries of

Albert v. Solimon

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 14, 1999
94 N.Y.2d 771 (N.Y. 1999)
Case details for

Albert v. Solimon

Case Details

Full title:CRYSTAL ALBERT, Appellant, v. EZZAT M. SOLIMON, Respondent

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 14, 1999

Citations

94 N.Y.2d 771 (N.Y. 1999)
699 N.Y.S.2d 1
721 N.E.2d 17

Citing Cases

Watts v. Champion Home Builders Company

Dismissal is not warranted under CPLR 3211 (a) (1) because the documentary evidence submitted by defendants…

Szydlowski v. Town of Bethlehem

Thus, affidavits and other evidentiary material may be considered to establish whether the plaintiff has a…