From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Albano v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 4, 1998
250 A.D.2d 555 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

May 4, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Mastro, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed with one bill of costs.

The plaintiff Louis Albano was injured when he tripped in a small hole, which was covered by grass, while walking over unpaved property outside a lodge owned by the defendant Benevolent and Protective Order of Elks, Staten Island Lodge No. 841 (hereinafter the Elks). The plaintiff's alleged that the Elks had a duty to maintain the property in a reasonably safe condition, and that the Elks had notice of the alleged defect. They further alleged that the City had a duty to compel the Elks to install a sidewalk, and that the City should have maintained the sidewalk in proper condition.

To establish a prima facie case of negligence in a slip and fall case, a plaintiff must demonstrate that the defendant either created the defect which caused the plaintiff's fall or had actual or constructive notice of it (see, Kraemer v. K-Mart Corp., 226 A.D.2d 590). In their respective motions for summary judgment, the City and the Elks made a prima facie showing that they did not create or have actual or constructive notice of the alleged defect.

The evidence presented by the plaintiffs in opposition to the motions for summary judgment failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether the defendants either created or had prior actual or constructive notice of the alleged defect (see, Katz v. City of New York, 87 N.Y.2d 241; see also, Poirier v. City of Schenectady, 85 N.Y.2d 310; Gordon v. American Museum of Natural History, 67 N.Y.2d 836; see also, Putnam v. Stout, 38 N.Y.2d 607, 612; Landau v. Town of Ramapo, 207 A.D.2d 384; McMullen v. State of New York, 199 A.D.2d 603). Furthermore, contrary to the plaintiffs' contention, the City is not under an affirmative duty to compel a landowner to install a sidewalk (see, Administrative Code of City of N.Y. § 19-152[c]; St. Jacques v. City of New York, 88 N.Y.2d 920, 922). Therefore, the Supreme Court did not err in granting the respondents' respective motions for summary judgment.

Bracken, J.P., O'Brien, Santucci and Altman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Albano v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 4, 1998
250 A.D.2d 555 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Albano v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:LOUIS ALBANO et al., Appellants, v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 4, 1998

Citations

250 A.D.2d 555 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
672 N.Y.S.2d 413

Citing Cases

Pianforini v. Kelties Bum Steer

The plaintiff simply stated that her foot slid on "something". In order to establish a prima facie case of…

Perrone v. Waldbaum, Inc.

The Supreme Court properly granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment, as the defendant demonstrated…