From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Akkaya v. Transp

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 13, 2007
45 A.D.3d 616 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

Summary

finding a fiduciary relationship between the parties and wrongdoing by the defendant to be “essential elements of an equity complaint where an accounting is demanded”

Summary of this case from In re Bernard L. Madoff Inv. Sec. Llc

Opinion

No. 2006-05519.

November 13, 2007.

In an action for an accounting, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Price, J.), dated May 8, 2006, which denied their motion for summary judgment on the complaint and granted that branch of the defendant's cross motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Stephen A. Katz, P.C., New York, N.Y., for appellants.

Pike Pike, P.C., Bellmore, N.Y. (Roberta C. Pike of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Miller, J.P., Lifson, Angiolillo and McCarthy, jj., concur.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

"The right to an accounting rests on the existence of a trust or fiduciary relationship regarding the subject matter of the controversy at issue" Town of New Windsor v New Windsor Volunteer Ambulance Corps, Inc., 16 AD3d 403, 404; see El-Khoury v Karasik, 265 AD2d 372, 373-374; Wesselmann v International Images, 259 AD2d 448; Chalasani v State Bank of India, N.Y. Branch, 235 AD2d 449, 450). "[T]here is no fiduciary relationship between a franchisee and a franchisor" ( Marcella Co. v Avon Prods., 282 AD2d 718, 719; see Wilmington Trust Co. v Burger King Corp., 34 AD3d 401; Bevilacque v Ford Motor Co., 125 AD2d 516, 519; Mobil Oil Corp. v Rubenfeld, 48 AD2d 428, 432, affd 40 NY2d 936). Here, the defendant established, and the plaintiffs conceded, that the relationship between the parties is one of franchisor and franchisees. Therefore, the defendant established its prima facie entitlement to summary judgment dismissing the complaint. In response, the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact regarding whether a fiduciary relationship existed. Therefore, the Supreme Court properly granted that branch of the defendant's cross motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.


Summaries of

Akkaya v. Transp

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 13, 2007
45 A.D.3d 616 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

finding a fiduciary relationship between the parties and wrongdoing by the defendant to be “essential elements of an equity complaint where an accounting is demanded”

Summary of this case from In re Bernard L. Madoff Inv. Sec. Llc
Case details for

Akkaya v. Transp

Case Details

Full title:ALAADDIN AKKAYA et al., Appellants, v. PRIME TIME TRANSPORTATION, INC.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 13, 2007

Citations

45 A.D.3d 616 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 8979
845 N.Y.S.2d 827

Citing Cases

WIRELESS ENTERPRISES, INC. v. AI CONSULTING, LLC

It appears well settled that generally, "[t]here is no fiduciary relationship between a franchisee and a…

Washington Tit. Ins. v. Streamline Agency Inc.

In order to maintain an action for an accounting, the party seeking the accounting must establish that a…