From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

AHERN v. OMNICARE ESC LLC

United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Western Division
Aug 17, 2009
NO. 5:08-CV-291-FL (E.D.N.C. Aug. 17, 2009)

Opinion

NO. 5:08-CV-291-FL.

August 17, 2009


ORDER


This matter comes before the court on the memorandum and recommendation ("M R") of the United States Magistrate Judge, which recommends this court grant defendant's motion to dismiss plaintiff's amended complaint. The time for objections to the M R has passed without either party filing an objection. In this posture, the issues raised are ripe for ruling.

Plaintiffs amended complaint sets forth two claims for relief: (1) that defendant discriminated against plaintiff on the basis of her sex in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 2000e; and (2) that defendant violated the public policy of the State of North Carolina set forth in North Carolina General Statute § 143-422.2, prohibiting sex discrimination in employment. (Am. Compl. ¶¶ 42-48.) Defendant filed a motion to dismiss plaintiff's amended complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). (DE # 21.)

The magistrate judge reviewed defendan t's motion to dismiss and entered an M R recommending dismissal of plaintiff's amended complaint with prejudice. The magistrate judge found inter alia that the allegations in plaintiff's amended complaint failed to make out a claim that defendant terminated plaintiff because of her sex and failed to allege sufficient facts to make out a claim for a hostile work environment based on widespread favoritism. (M R 6-14.) The magistrate judge found the same analysis applied to plaintiff's state law claims. (M R 14.) Finally, the magistrate judge found that dismissal with prejudice was appropriate because the defects in plaintiff's amended complaint do not appear curable and plaintiff has already had the opportunity to amend her complaint once in this action. (M R 14-15.)

After thorough review of the pleadings, defendant's motion to dismiss, the M R and the relevant case law, this court agrees with the magistrate judge. The conclusions reached in the M R are well-supported by the controlling case law as applied to the facts of this case. Consequently, where there are no objections to the M R, the court ADOPTS the findings and recommendation of in the M R as its own. Defendant's motion to dismiss is hereby GRANTED, and plaintiff's amended complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The clerk of court is directed to close the case.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

AHERN v. OMNICARE ESC LLC

United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Western Division
Aug 17, 2009
NO. 5:08-CV-291-FL (E.D.N.C. Aug. 17, 2009)
Case details for

AHERN v. OMNICARE ESC LLC

Case Details

Full title:BARBARA AHERN, Plaintiff, v. OMNICARE ESC LLC, a subsidiary of OMNICARE…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Western Division

Date published: Aug 17, 2009

Citations

NO. 5:08-CV-291-FL (E.D.N.C. Aug. 17, 2009)

Citing Cases

Kelly v. Howard I. Shapiro & Assocs. Consulting Eng'rs, P.C.

However, even assuming a single consensual sexual relationship between a supervisor and co-employee could…

Equal Employment Opportunity Comm. v. Tuscarora Yarns

As to the first element, a complaint must allege facts of unwelcome conduct, such as instances of sexual…